Five judge-bench at SC to hear Aadhaar next week

The Supreme Court has agreed to create a bank to set up five judges to decide privacy protection issues under the Aadhaar law.

The constitution bank will meet next week for two days to decide whether the matter should be referred to a larger bank.

The President of the Supreme Court of India, JS Khehar’s decision, came after senior council Shyam Divan mentions the issue in court Wednesday morning.

Divan lawsuit – with the support of the Attorney General KK Venugopal is under an order of 2015, where a jury of five judges headed by Indian Supreme Court President HL Dattu, had addressed all issues privacy issue at the Aadhaar Matter to a court of the Constitution.

The recent Divan lawsuit came after a comment made by Judge Jasas Chelameswar that said a bank of the Constitution should have all issues arising from the issuance of Aadhaar.

The observation of Judge Chelameswar was made last week when the subject of the Aadhaar reached the hearing before the plenary by virtue of a June 27 order issued by a bank holidays.

Sofa, representing the petitioners and Venugopal, accepted the court’s suggestion and agreed to refer the matter jointly to the Chief Justice of India next week.

“My opinion is that once a matter has been submitted to a bank of the Constitution, all issues arising from them must be with the bank. I can only say that a matter can be settled by a court of nine judges.

Can decide the possibility that nine judges hear, “said the judge who leads Chelameswar bank three judges also formed by judges and AM Khanwilkar Navin Sinha.

During the brief hearing, Sofá recalled the orders of an order of October 2015, which referred the matter to an Aadhaar court of the Constitution.

During his speech, Couch said that the number of notifications issued by the Aadhar Order Center – a clear departure from the law under which he volunteers – appeared to be one of the Indian concentration camps.

The AG, however, an exception to this submission and noted that if Divan continued in the direction of this argument, he was unwilling to follow the case. “How can he (SOFA) that India is like a concentration camp? ‘” Venugopal said.

Several petitions that question the constitutional validity of Aadhar pending before the apex court. However, it has been almost two years and the highest court has not yet appointed a court to hear the issue despite several calls.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *